Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« November 2005 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Add to Technorati Favorites
Rantings of a Crazed Soccer Mom
Monday, 14 November 2005
What Happens To All Those Teen Aged Mothers?

This morning, while my daughter and I were waiting for the school bus, the conversation turned to what it was like in the hospital right after she was born. I told her about the New Mothers’ Class and how, at 39, I was easily the oldest mom there. Everyone else looked to be in their twenties, possibly early thirties. There was also a teenager, no older than 16, who looked bewildered by it all and more than a little scared by what was to come.

In the space of about 45 minutes, a nurse attempted to cover all the things we should expect from our newborns. She directed many of her comments to this girl, to reassure her in her new role.

Today, it occurred to me that the girl in the Newborn Class is now 26 and her son is ten years old, just like my daughter. This morning she probably got him up for school, made his lunch and kissed him good-bye, and sent him off to fifth grade.

When you think of teen-aged pregnancy, you think of teenagers with babies. You don’t think of what happens as the children and their moms grow up. And they do. I’ve always hoped this girl had the support of her family and community, that her son grew up in a safe and nurturing environment, that she managed to stay in school, maybe went on to college and got a good job to support herself and her son. And maybe she met a really nice guy along the way.

She’s no longer part of the Teen Aged Pregnancy problem. She’s all grown up with grown up problems. You could see her at Wal-Mart and not notice her. Just a mother and son out shopping.

I was part of the generation of teenaged girls who went against the mores of the day and decided to keep their babies. Up until then, when a girl got in trouble, the only way to keep her baby was to persuade her boyfriend to marry her. As you would expect, most of these marriages between sixteen and seventeen year olds didn’t last beyond the child’s first birthday, but at least the girls got to raise their own children. The alternative was to disappear to a home for unwed mothers, give the baby up for adoption and return home like nothing happened.

So is this working? There are thousands of grown men and women out there who were born to teenaged girls who decided to keep them. What sort of people did they become? Are they good citizens or hoodlums? Or some of both?

Perhaps the hardest thing to accept about having a baby is not all the earth shattering changes you have to deal with. It’s that discovery that they don’t stay babies. They turn into ten year olds and 17 year olds and finally adults with lives of their own. And it’s your job to see that they get there. I’m just hoping that 16 year old girl was up to the challenge.

Posted by judy5cents at 9:45 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 10 November 2005
Oh Joy! It's Sweeps Month Again!

“Child sex slaves in YOUR neighborhood. Help us stop this problem now! Next on Oprah.”

That’s what I heard when I turned on the television last Friday afternoon.

Now I have no way of knowing this, but I’m reasonably sure there are no child sex slaves in my neighborhood. The biggest problem here is the guy next door who constantly burns leaves and trash.

I had to wonder why Oprah was tackling such a lurid subject. And then I remembered. It’s November. Sweeps Month. Lurid brings in viewers. Celebrities bring in viewers. And if you can combine lurid with celebrities, you hit the ratings jackpot.

Singer Ricky Martin was also on the child sex trafficking show. Since I didn’t watch, I’m not sure what qualifies a pop star to speak out on child sex trafficking, other than to say he’s against it. It’s a hell of a way to promote your new CD.

The lurid stories don’t stop there. Yesterday Oprah interviewed best selling author Terri MacMillan about the details of her nasty divorce. Did you know Terri MacMillan married a man 20 years younger than herself and he turned out to be gay????? And wouldn’t you know it, he was after her money! Shocking!

On an upcoming show, mega star Leonardo Di Caprio will be expounding on global warning. It’s kind of hard to get people all hot and bothered about global warning, but maybe Leonardo’s cute enough to do the trick, and hundreds of thousands of Oprah viewers will be writing to their representatives asking them to ratify the Kyota Accords.

Oprah is not the only one caught up in Sweeps Month fever. I’m sure Dateline will feature stories of murder, incest and celebrity scandals. CSI will show some incredibly creepy crime scenario (although I’m inclined to believe they can’t possibly top the show where the murder victim got off on wearing diapers and acting like a baby) And it wouldn’t be Sweeps Month without another "powerful" episode of ER.

Hey, it beats re-runs.

And by the way, like Ricky Martin, I too am against child sex-trafficking. If you really would like to let your representative know that you are as well, click here.


Posted by judy5cents at 9:01 AM EST
Updated: Friday, 11 November 2005 6:25 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 8 November 2005
But He's Staying On Message

Second terms are always a bitch, aren’t they?

Ronald Reagan had his Iran-Contra Scandal. Bill Clinton had his impeachment hearings over the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Lyndon Johnson had the Viet Nam War go south on him.

So George Bush shouldn’t feel so down about his latest poll numbers.

Well maybe he should.

Remember back in 2000, he won (well, sort of) running on the platform of bringing honesty and integrity to the White House? He said he’d hold his administration to a higher ethical standard, "not just what the lawyers allow but what the public deserves.”

With the indictment of Dick Cheney’s right hand man I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, George Bush is not looking as much like the stand-up guy he presented himself to be back in 2000 and the polls are showing it. In a recent ABC news poll, 58 percent of those polled said Bush was not honest or trustworthy, and only 40 percent saying he was.

He even lost ground on his perennial favorite, values. Again, 58 percent said he did not share their values, with only 40 percent saying he did.

The hallmark of the Bush administration has been its members' steadfast, tight lipped loyalty to the president. Now with the indictments in the investigation over the leaking of CIA operative Valerie Plame’s name to the press, it’s all falling apart. Bush is out there, staying on message just like he’s been taught, but let’s be honest here, he looks pathetic without the help of Vice President Dick Cheney and chief of staff Karl Rove, who are a bit distracted right now.

It’s been a bad year. His national tour to replace Social Security with individual retirement accounts did no more than rack up the miles on Air Force One. With the dismal performance of FEMA director Michael Brown followed by the nomination of his good friend and chief counsel Harriet Meirs to the Supreme Court, it became absolutely clear that the Bush administration ran on the principal of “You take care of me and I’ll take care of you.” Good old boy cronyism in its purest form.

And despite protestations to the contrary, the administration is now advocating torture. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has submitted an anti-torture provision to the senate, but Cheney wants an exemption for the CIA and has made the rounds drumming up support among Republicans, as well as suggesting that the White House would veto this bill.

Okay, this president has never once vetoed a spending bill, (remember those damn bridges in Alaska?), or any bill for that matter. So the first time he goes against the will of Congress is to allow people to be tortured. What a guy.

Now the president maintains it’s not torture, it’s self defense. In other words, it’s okay to torture bad people to keep them from doing bad things.

I've always had a hard time with this president. I've never been able to stomach the fact that the most powerful man in the free world was a worthless drunk until he turned 40 and found Jesus. What happens to the country if he loses Jesus and finds Jack Daniels? It’s been known to happen.

I just wish the Bush administration could have imploded at this time a year ago. Could have been a whole ‘nother ball game.

Posted by judy5cents at 9:27 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 2 November 2005
In One Woman's Lifetime

August 11, 1902. On that day, at the very beginning of the twentieth century, my grandmother, Marjorie Cook Sherman, was born.

She lived well past 47.3 years, the life expectancy for a female at that time, dying last month at the age of 103.

I try to imagine what it would be like to live that long–-what would it be like to wake up and look at a calendar that reads July, 2059? Or, to turn it around, realize that when my grandmother was the same age as me (49), it was the fall of 1951. The Korean war was not history, it was front page news.

When Marjorie Cook came into the world, there were 8,000 cars in the United States. Henry Ford had yet to open up his factory in Detroit. The US population was around 76 million with 45 states, and the world population was 1.65 billion. Theodore Roosevelt had been president for less than a year, taking over when William McKinley died of the bullet wounds inflicted by an assassin in Buffalo, NY. The average salary was $12.98 a week for 59 hours. Forty hour work weeks were a long ways off. The United States Treasury was not yet in debt, but had a positive balance of $46,000,000.

I’m sure the American population of 1902 would be aghast to find out that in the future the national debt would go into the trillions.

It boggles the mind just to think about all the innovations and events Marjorie saw in the course of her lifetime. Women voting, automobiles, movies with sound, World Wars I & II, the Cold War, air travel, television, automatic washing machines, dishwashers, men on the moon, personal computers, the fall of the Soviet Union, the world wide web.

Of course, like most centenarians, Marjorie never thought much about living past 100. She was busy with her life. Growing up in Snahomish WA, she went to teacher’s college and taught first grade. With a sense of adventure, she decided to take a teaching job in the US Territory of Hawaii, where she met a naval officer named Warren Sherman, who was the divorced father of three children.

With the death of Warren’s ex-wife, those three children came to live with the newly married couple. It must have been a challenge, suddenly finding yourself with two stepdaughters and a stepson, ages 9 to 15. My mother was the youngest, and Marjorie won her over with her butterscotch pudding.

Being a stepmother can be a losing proposition no matter how hard you try. It is the mark of a great character when your stepchildren speak highly of you. My mother and her siblings maintained a close relationship with Marjorie throughout her life. Though she never had any children, she was the best grandmother any kid could ask for.

Marjorie was also a breast cancer survivor–for 45 years. In 1960, her doctor found a lump in her breast and insisted she have a mastectomy right away. Proof that even in the 1960s, breast cancer did not have to be a death sentence.

It’s sad to think of a world without my grandmother in it, a woman who loved life and stayed positive and alert well into her last months. But 103 years is long enough for anyone, even Marjorie Cook Sherman. It’s time to rest, now.

Posted by judy5cents at 11:20 AM EST
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink
Thursday, 27 October 2005
BUT DOESN'T IT MELT BY THE TIME YOU GET IT HOME?

What is the deal with delivering ice to hurricane victims?

Last night the news networks showed footage of the long lines of people in South Florida, waiting not so patiently for bags of ice. They had been without electricity for two days and were desperate for it.

I can see the need for ice if you're on medication that requires refrigeration, but most of those people standing in line looked pretty healthy to me.

So what do they use all that ice for?

To keep food from spoiling? To cool their drinks? To rub on their foreheads because there's no air conditioning?

OK residents of South Florida. You live in an area prone to hurricanes. You need to be prepared. That means you understand the fact that you could be without electricity and water for a few days and you plan accordingly. You have enough non-perishable food on hand to last at least three days. It's not what you're used to, but you can live just fine on Spam, crackers and peanut butter sandwiches.

You can't say you don't have any warning. I live in North Carolina and I knew Wilma was heading your way at least three days before it hit. Plenty of time to get to a grocery store for food and water. And if you don't want to spend the money, before the hurricane hits, you fill up bottles with water and then you go fill up the bathtub.

Personally, I think all those FEMA ice trucks are a waste of money.

Warm water hydrates just as well as cold water. So what if you have to drink your Coca-Cola at room temperature? Deal with it.


Posted by judy5cents at 6:23 AM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink
Monday, 24 October 2005
The Bridge To Nowhere

I have not done a scientific poll on this issue, but I’m reasonably sure that an overwhelming majority of U.S. voters are opposed to spending $230 million of their tax dollars to build a bridge from Ketchikan, Alaska (pop. 8,900) to Gravin Island, (pop. 50). And not just opposed, either. We’re outraged, we’re appalled, we are hopping mad about it. Especially when Congress is cutting funds on Medicare and Medicaid to cover the costs of damage from Hurricane Katrina.

So when Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) proposed a bill to withdraw the funding for the Alaksa project and use it to rebuild the bridge across Lake Ponchatrain in Louisiana, you’d think that every senator would vote the will of their constituents and the tally would be 98 to 2 in favor of the change.

Guess again.

Apparently the Senate is far more concerned about placating Ted Stevens (R-AK) than they are about the will of the people in their own states. A huge majority of senators (82) voted to let Stevens keep the money for the bridge, which, as Senator Coburn pointed out, is enough to buy everyone on the island their own Lear jet.

Senator Stevens argued that it was unfair to take money away from Alaska and only Alaska. He threw a hissy fit on the Senate floor, saying he wasn’t going to let his state be singled out like this and he’d quit if the bill passed. And he got his way.

Obviously, the real motivation behind the vote was that the senators from the other 49 states were afraid for their own pork projects. If Alaska loses its bridge, you might lose your highway bypass in your state and we might lose our traffic control study money in our state. We can’t allow that to happen.

Yes, you can. In fact, you could even do the right thing and volunteer to give up all the bridges and the highway bypasses and the traffic control studies approved in that monstrous transportation bill.

I’m proud to say that one of the 15 senators who voted against the bil was Senator Robert Burr who represents my state of North Carolina. He’s a conservative Republican and I didn’t vote for him, but I’m with him on this issue and I sent him an e-mail telling him so. To see how your senator voted, click here.

And wihle you're at it, send your senator an e-mail telling him/her what you think about his/her vote.

Posted by judy5cents at 7:53 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 24 October 2005 8:08 AM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink
Tuesday, 18 October 2005
Credit Counseling--Don't Get Sick
Yesterday, the bankruptcy “reform” law went into effect. Now it’s more difficult to have debts wiped clean and start over again. Individuals declaring bankruptcy will be required to pay back at least some of their debts, depending on their income.

The law also requires that people filing for bankruptcy get credit counseling.

Having worked as a customer representative in the credit industry, I spoke to more than a few callers with poor money management skills. These are the people who don’t realize that if they only make minimum payments while continuing to buy items on credit, their balances get bigger and bigger. I would definitely agree that these people could use some help in getting out of debt and some guidance on how to stay out of debt.

However, the number one reason for declaring bankruptcy is the inability to pay medical bills. I have to ask, what good is credit counseling in these cases?

Will credit counseling teach people how to avoid becoming castrophically ill? Will they learn where they can go for low cost health insurance when their employers don't offer it? And what about the unemployed, self-employed, or those unable to get insurance because of a pre-existing condition? Can counseling help if you've racked up a pile of hospital bills because your health insurance turned out to be one of many scam policies which cover the small claims, but disappear when it comes to covering the expenses of a serious illness?

Even people who have insurance coverage can be caught up in mounting debt. Many policies pay 80 percent of medical costs, requiring their customers to pay the other 20 percent. If you need something extreme, like a kidney transplant, it can cost up to a million dollars or more. That means you have to come up with $200,000. Right now.

Requiring people in this situation to sign up for credit counseling is not only a waste of everyone’s time, it’s literally adding insult to injury. Yes, I’m sorry, next time I have children, I’ll make sure they don’t have cystic fibrosis or congenital heart disease. Next time I’ll marry someone who won’t get cancer.

The obvious solution, is of course, universal health care. But Congress has never been very good at recognizing the obvious.

Posted by judy5cents at 8:25 AM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, 18 October 2005 8:32 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 14 October 2005
Low Ranking Author Blues

I never thought much about my standings on Amazon.com. Until recently, Amazon charged a whopping $20.00 for Caviar Dreams and it took forever for them to ship it.

Then I read somewhere that your standings don't depend on sales, but how often people click on your book, as well as reviews given. Of course actual sales don't hurt. In an effort to boost my authors' rank, I've been clicking on Caviar Dreams every day.

And it's not working at all.

When I started the project I was at 1,750,000 or thereabouts. Today I am at 1,801,113, right below The Other David, a novel of suspense by Carol Coker (out of print) and above Contracting on a Capitated Basis: Managing Risk for Your Practice (Apa Practitioner's Toolbox Series) by Lybrand, et al. A few days ago, I was right below the Sarasota/Bradenton, Fl Atlas by Inc. Trakker Maps, now it's seven spaces above me at 1,801,106.

I expect by the end of the year, I'll hit 2,000,000. But I'm in good company. Along with Ms. Coker and Lybrand, et al, there's The Cook It and Freeze It Book by Margaret Deeds Murphy at 1,801,104, Two Novels: The Natural and the Assistant by Bernard Malamud at 1,801,121, The Wit and Wisdom of Wall Street at 1,801,115, and my favorite Guns N'roses In Person - Biography by Guns N' Roses at 1,801,122.

I should add that all of these books are out of print with limited availablility. Which I believe gives me a slight advantage. You can buy my book.

Anyway, if you'd like to help me catch up with Mort Walker's Beetle Bailey: Dog Gone (1,801,101), click here. Leave a review. And (dare I ask?) buy the book from Amazon

Posted by judy5cents at 10:08 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 11 October 2005
Singing The Baby Blues
There is new hope for childless couples living in Connecticut. The state legislature passed a law requiring insurance companies to cover fertility treatments for residents of the state.

But there’s a catch. It’s only for women under 40.

NPR aired a tearful protest from a 42 year old woman decrying the unfairness of the decision, She felt that if her doctors believed she was able to have children, she should be entitled to the coverage as well. Of course, this woman and her husband had already spent $100,000 on fertility treatments without success, so there had been plenty of unfairness in her life already.

I can sympathize with her. I know what it’s like to want a child but not be able to get pregnant. However, I knew very well I was not infertile. Just too old.

At the age of 38 I got pregnant so quickly with my daughter, it was frightening. If I’d gotten an early enough start on it, I’m sure I could have given birth to five or six children, assuming there was a willing father in the picture and enough money to support them all. But at age 40, my childbearing years were over and I just had to deal with it.

These days, women are able to have careers and put off having children, but there’s no guarantee that their ovaries will cooperate when they finally do find the right guy and want to start a family.

The reality is that we live in a modern world of choices and opportunities, but our reproductive systems are still back in the dark ages. They’re geared for a time when survival of the species depended on young girls having six or seven babies by the time they were 23, before they died of infection or small pox or just shear exhaustion. Even though we’re nowhere near ready to have children then, we still hit our peak of fertility in our teens and gradually lose it over the years. By the time we reach the age of 35, it’s doubtful we can get pregnant at all.

Sure Madonna had a baby when she was 42. So did my great aunt Margarite. And Tony Blair’s wife had one when she was 45. The end of fertility is different for everybody. But the fact remains that a majority of women (60%) will not be able to conceive after the age of 40.

During those dreadful months when I wanted so much to get pregnant, I checked into fertility treatments. What I found was not encouraging. As you grow older, your eggs grow old too. After age 40, they are no longer viable, making in vitro fertilization with your own eggs virtually impossible. All those movie stars you see having babies at 46 and 47 are giving birth to someone else’s biological children. There’s a whole new industry springing up in recruiting young women to be egg donors. Kind of creepy, if you ask me.

So the Connecticut legislature is just following the rules nature has already set up. And until modern science finds a way to change those rules, we have to learn to live with them.

Posted by judy5cents at 10:41 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 16 November 2005 3:15 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 4 October 2005
Working
For the last few weeks I've been getting in my car and driving downtown to answer the phone in a real estate office, among other things. It's a temp job while the person who usually does these tasks is on vacation so I won't be getting comfortable here.

I've forgotten what it was like to work. I love feeling useful. Stay at home moms do not often get to feel that way. At my house, no one notices what I do until I don't do it. And there aren't those little kudos from the boss like "Great job on changing that last diaper," or "You handled that sibling rivalry situation so well. Way to go!"

Every day when I leave, the desk is neat and cleared of clutter, and it will be that way when I come back the next day. When I leave work, I know that everything that was supposed to get done got done. And I don't have to vacuum.

The downside is that all the things I did at home still have to get done. My husband is helping but the house is pretty grungy by Saturday.

It's exciting to have life out in the real world. I think I'll stay in it for a while. And I can tell you where you can stick that vacuum cleaner.

Posted by judy5cents at 12:14 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older