Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« January 2008 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Add to Technorati Favorites
Rantings of a Crazed Soccer Mom
Friday, 11 January 2008
Is There Really A Point To All This?
 

Today, just for the hell of it, I googled the exact phrase "give up on writing."  And guess what?  On nearly every site generated, the phrase apperaed in the negative. As in "Don't give up on writing," or "I was afraid I might give up on writing, but...." or "He stubbornly refused to give up on writing."

So apparently, writing is a good, even if no one reads the fruit of your labors, and giving up writing is a very bad thing that no one ever does. I found lots of blogs encouraging aspiring writers to just keep at it and somehow they will prevail.

I love writing. At least I think I do. Some things I write all the time like e-mails and blogs and "to do" lists. I've written two books, but at the moment I have no less than three first chapters to three different books, all of which are languishing on the hard drive. I'm just not interested in writing those any more.

There are plenty of other things I could be doing instead of writing. Volunteering at the Phoenix Employment Ministries. Going to an agility training class with Bailey the Border Collie. Helping my daughter assemble the intricate "Visible Woman" model I got her for Christmas. Sitting by the pool with my husband, drinking wine and talking politics. And the world would do just fine without my books.

Lately I've come to believe that the internet is full of writers in search of an ever dwindling supply of readers. Or at least readers willing to shell out money to buy their books.

With the advent of Print On Demand Publishing, anybody with a computer and a few hundred dollars to spare can sell their own book online. I've got a book, you've got a book, the nice lady in Poughkeepsie has a book. Are they worth reading? Who knows?

So we all engage in futile attempts to get The Reader's attention. We offer prizes on our websites. We send out press releases and court reviews and visit independent book stores. We send out post cards and we attend conferences and we set up book signings. We join online forums and promote our events. We spend an awful lot of time and an awful lot of money and at the end of the fiscal year, our publishers send us royalty checks for amounts that aren't enough to buy a double latte at Starbuck's.

I know a lot of writers who love the whole marketing thing and do pretty well at it. I'm not one of them. I grew up in the Midwest where nobody likes a show off and going around telling people what a great book you've written is bragging, plain and simple. And then expecting people to pay for it? Get over yourself!

There's a song by The Who called "Success Story," which has  a wonderful line that goes "take two hundred and seventy six....you know, this used to be fun."

And that's how I'm feeling about writing these days. It used to be fun and I want it to be that way again. I want to enjoy getting out, meeting readers and hanging with other writers. It shouldn't feel like an obligation or a burden or a waste of time.

I'm hoping I'll change my attitude once Tree Huggers comes out this spring.

In the meantime, please don't send me any sappy e-mails of encouragement or inspirational quotes. I'll only bite your head off.


Posted by judy5cents at 1:12 PM EST
Updated: Friday, 11 January 2008 1:13 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 9 January 2008
Walt Must By Gyrating In His Cryogenic Tank

I'm a bit late to the table as far as seeing Pirates of The Caribbean, World's End. I know it came out last summer but I passed on seeing it when it was in the theatres, Based on the reviews saying it was long and hard to follow, I figured it wasn't that it wasn't worth sitting through the nearly 3 hour runtime just for the few minutes that Keith Richards is on screen.

However, I let my daughter go see it with her friends. I didn't see any problem, she'd seen the previous installments and when reviews said it was "grim," I figured if she could handle the Harry Potter films, she could handle this one. She came back saying it was all right, but she liked the other two better and that was it. After seeing it, I realize I should research the movies she sees more carefully. If I knew last summer what I know now, I don't know if I'd let her go.

**spoiler alert**

(Of course, I don't really care if I spoil it for you--if you really were interested in this film, you certainly would have seen it by now)

The opening scene is a mass execution of pirate sympathizers. The condemned prisoners walk in shackles to the gallows, as the govenor announces the island is under martial law and lists the rights that have been revoked: habeus corpus, the right of assembly, the right to a trial by jury.  Anyone found guilty of supporting pirates will be sentenced to hang by the neck until dead.

One of the convicts is a little boy. As he stands beneath the noose, he begins singing a mournful song that we assume to be the Pirate's Anthem. And all the other prisoners join him. A barrel is brought in so the boy can reach the noose.

At this point, I thought something would happen to save the little boy. Maybe Jack Sparrow would come swooping in, reminiscent of Lee Marvin riding up on his white horse to rescue Jane Fonda the final scene of Cat Ballou. But no. In this Walt Disney film, the company known for all around wholesome family entertainment, a little boy is executed. No one saves him.

 I'll say this again. The little boy dies!

Up until that point, I found the whole premise fascinating, given the fact that if you substituted the word "terrorist" or "Al-Quaeda" for "pirate," you got the current policies for the Bush administration. (or at least the ones they'd like to have) And the singing reminded me of that poignant scene in Casablanca, when the supposedly jaded patrons of Rick's American Cafe stand up and sing the French National Anthem in defiance of the Nazis.

I'm not sure what the intention was in portraying the state sanctioned death of a child.  I know that goes on all over the world, and there have even been supreme court cases concerning minors and capital punishment. But this was supposed to be a fun movie. I'm sure there were plenty of parents who found themselves trying to explain to their younger children that the movie wasn't real, and the little boy was just an actor, he wasn't really killed, it was just make-believe.

I felt the same way when I saw Disney's Haunted Mansion, which, like Pirates, was inspired by a Disneyland ride. That movie included a scene where Eddie Murphy's children find themselves in a pool full of gruesome corpses. Those type of scenes scared the bejesus out of me when I was well into my twenties (You should have heard my squeal during Raiders of the Lost Ark).

I'm not sure where I'm going with this. I'm not in favor of censorship, and having to sit through those cloying Disney features of yesteryear is not something I care to do again. (Go rent Pollyanna with Hayley Mills and you'll know what I'm talking about). But even so, I don't like the direction we're heading. There's no one around saying. "Hey, this is violence to a child and not at all appropriate for a film aimed at kids."

So this year, I will resolve to research films more thoroughly before allowing my daughter to see them with her friends. Going by the ratings isn't enough. I take full responsibility for what my daughter sees. I just worry about all those other parents, who look at the PG rating and say "What's the harm?"


Posted by judy5cents at 6:30 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 21 December 2007
George Bailey and The Unknown Unknowns

George Bailey and The Unknown Unknowns
Current mood: imaginative

So how many times have you seen "It's A Wonderful Life?" I kind of miss the days when it was in the public domain. During the week before Christmas, you could watch back to back showings of it, if you had basic cable and a lot of time on your hands.

It's an interesting concept. For those of you who've been living under rocks for the last 50 some years, Building & Loan owner George Bailey (Jimmy Stewart) finds himself comtemplating suicide in the face of 1mounting money problems. Then Clarence, an angel in training, shows him what his town would have been like if he'd never been born. What a difference. Without George, quaint little Bedford Falls becomes a decadent mini-Las Vegas in the snow and everyone he knows is bitter and selfish.

Worst of all, his wife Mary is a (gasp!) librarian! And a spinster to boot. Oh, the horror.

He decides that his life is pretty good and everyone in town shows up at his house with money to pay off Old Man Potter. They all drink eggnog and sing Auld Lang Syne.

In real life there's no such thing. You don't get to live the alternative ending or to go for a ride on the road not taken. What happens, happens and there are no angels showing you how things would have turned out.

Even so, I've been thinking there must have been quite a few never-born George Baileys. Like the George Bailey who designed ballots in Florida for the 2000 presidential election and came up with the one that was so easy to understand, 3000 senior citizens voted for Al Gore instead of Pat Buchannan.

Or the George Bailey who worked at the Texas Book Depository in 1963 and stopped Lee Harvey Oswald as he was getting ready to walk up the stairs and assassinate President Kennedy.

Maybe there could have been a George Bailey who was a senior officer in the FBI who noticed reports that Middle Eastern men taking flying lessons were not at all interested in learning how to take off or land. And then took steps to detain them.

I like to think we are all George Bailey, charged with making a difference in the lives of those we touch and those they touch, right here, right now.

And remember, every time a bell rings, an angel gets his wings


Posted by judy5cents at 2:28 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 17 December 2007
What Are We Going To Do Without Ike and Dan?
Mood:  chillin'

Music lost a couple of once-greats this month. Dan Fogelberg died of prostate cancer at the age of 56. His song "Longer" (Longer than there've been fishes in the ocean....I've been in love with you...) was played at millions of weddings in the late 1970s and early 80s. Ask any woman my age, and she'll probably have a memory of slow dancing with that special someone to a soft and squishy Dan Fogelberg song.

And Ike Turner also went to the great band in the sky. Although he was a talented blues guitarist and a rock-and-roll pioneer, he's best known for beating up on his wife Tina, who had the misfortune of becoming far more famous than her husband and went on to write a book and then a movie about her marriage. 

Even though both of these musicians released albums recently (Full Circle by Fogelberg in 2003 and Risin With The Blues  by Turner in 2006), for most of us, they're distant memories, their songs only heard once in a while on the Classic Rock stations, if we happen to be listening at all.

Fame is fleeting and it doesn't take much to become a has-been. Even worse, a tell-all biography by your ex-wife can define forever who and what you are, so much that your obiturary glosses over your many accomplishments, instead focusing on what a jerk you were.

But with the advent of MP3 files, the music can live on forever in your IPod. So you can always relive that cherished memory of dancing with what's-his-name at Homecominge in 1979.


Posted by judy5cents at 11:56 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 4 December 2007
The Direction of "The Golden Compass"

I've been looking forward to seeing the film "The Golden Compass," the fantasy starring Nicole Kidman and Daniel  Craig. I've seen the trailers and it looks like a lot of fun.  It's got a giant talking polar bear wearing body armor and a flying clipper ship. And Sam Elliott looks darn cool.

But wait. This film promotes atheism. It attacks Christianity. It's based on the first book in a trilogy by Phillip Pullman, the man CNN refers to as "a religious skeptic." Roman Catholics and Evengelical Christians say it will hook children into Pullman's books and a dark, individualistic world where all religion is evil. And they'll all become atheists, so don't let your kids see it.

Jiminy, that is one powerful film. Can they come up with one that will convince my daughter to read math books and do her chores?

I have nothing against atheists. I'm married to one. I figure my husband has way more influence over our daughter's beliefs than Phillip Pullman. And that is as it should be.  My husband's beliefs, or lack of them, are just as valid as mine.

As I've said before, I attend a Presbyterian Church in Wilmington. It's small, but with a varied congregation. Some members are Christian fundamentalists, who believe in a literal translation of the bible, some are liberals like me, who see the bible as myth and methaphor, and the rest are in between. But we are all encouraged to explore our beliefs and ask questions.

Atheism is getting a lot of press lately. There are best selling books out like "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins and "God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything," by Christopher Hitchens.  I've read interviews with these men, and it seems to me what they object to is not the religion, but the people in charge. They say religions start wars, religions promote intolerance, religions are judgmental and cruel.

No, it's not the religion doing that, it's evil people using their religion as a convenient excuse to do what they want to do. It's not about God, it's about power.

And despite what you may think, a film starring Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig has little power over the spiritual journey of your sons and daughters. That is theirs and theirs alone.


Posted by judy5cents at 8:23 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 14 November 2007
Separating Church And State

Okay, I'm going to hold a little civics lesson here. We all know that the First Amendment to our constitution allows Americans (and everyone else living here) to freely practice the religion of their choice. Or to practice no religion at all if we so desire. Specifically, it ensuress that the government--and that means any government, from the halls of Congress to the municipal offices of  small towns across the country---will not promote or suppress any religion. It's called the anti-establishment clause.

So why is the Governor Sonny Perdueof Georgia praying for rain outside the state Capitol in Atlanta on the taxpayers' dime?  Sure looks like state sanctioned religion to me. He's the governor and he's promoting Christianity.

Now I am not a godless atheist. I go to church. I'm a member of the Persall Memorial Presbyterian in Wilmington. I attend the Christian Insights Adult Sunday School Class and I sing in the choir. And yes, I also tithe.

Governor Perdue is practicing what my pastor calls the vending machine theology of prayer, "prayer in-blessing out." God is not going to make it rain, no matter how strongly we believe in Him or how humbly we make our request. There are a lot of reasons why there's an alarming shortage of water in Georgia, most of them due to human activity.

This is not the first time a governor has tried to pray his way out of a meteorological catastrophe. Back in 1979, when a shortage of heating oil combined with a brutally cold Ohio winter and residents couldn't heat their homes, then Governor Jim Rhodes asked everyone to pray for warmer weather. As I recall, it warmed up eventually (what a miracle!) and extra barrels of heating oil somehow appeared. So I suppose it worked. But then, as now, prayer is not decisive action and when an elected official resorts to it, he doesn't appear statesmanlike, just desperate.

Another example of government sanctioned religion was featured on the PBS show Nova last night. "Judgment Day" recounted how the school board for Dover schools in Pennsylvania insisted that Intelligent Design should be taught in the schools along with the Theory of Evolution. An excellent program and as you would suspect, Science won out over Religion.

I never can understand why so many Christians feel that it's okay to send out death threats to people who don't agree with them. I'm sure there's got to be something in the Bible that says it's a sin to tell someone to fear for his life because you're going to kill him. Seems to me that if it's possible to commit adultery in your heart, it's possible to commit murder.

Religion is personal. It can't be legislated or taught to everyone in the public schools. And God bless the ACLU, protecting my right to go to church and believe in the theory of evolution.

 


Posted by judy5cents at 7:24 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 9 November 2007
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle

My sister Amy recently came back from a retreat in the Oregon forests, at a resort where the food was all natural vegetarian and Everything was recycled. Even the toilet paper.

Okay, they didn't literally recycle the toilet paper (ewwww!), but it was made of 100% recycled materials. All well and good, but the factory where those rolls of toilet paper were produced was located in Vermont.

That's three thousand miles away.

Although neither of us knew for sure how the toilet paper was transported, it's a safe bet that petroleum products and carbon emissions were involved. It is possible that this Vermont company has a fleet of cyclists furiously pedalling across the country with boxes of toilet paper strapped to their luggage racks, but I'd say the company opted for something a lot quicker and a lot less expensive, like UPS ground transport.

There are trees growing in Oregon and they are a renewable resource. Even though they wouldn't be made of recycled paper, locally made toilet paper would arrive in the bathrooms without the cross country trip.

I recycle. I also use paper towels, which are not on recycled paper. Yes, using cloth towels and rags to clean the kitchen would cut down on landfill waste, but they spread germs unless they are constantly washed. That requires an output of energy. More carbon emissions.

I understand that my niece is using cloth diapers for her newborn son (the most adorable baby in the universe, by the way). I wish her well in that endeavor, but I'm not sure how long she can last. I was going to use cloth diapers with my daughter too, until the first time she took a nap in one. Not only the diaper needed to be changed, but her jammies and the sheets as well. I can see why my mother was so keen to have us all potty trained before we were two.

I suppose a lot my reluctance to be as green as I should be is laziness on my part, along with the feeling that with millions and millions of people using paper towels and plastic bottles and non-recycled toilet paper, giving up my paper towel jones won't make that much difference in the total scheme of things.

But I try to use them sparingly. And maybe someday I will kick the habit.


Posted by judy5cents at 10:12 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 7 November 2007
Only 52 Weeks To Go

Last night as election results crawled across the bottom of the television screen, my daughter asked who I thought would win. I said I didn't know, it was just a runoff election for the Wilmington City Council which didn't affect us, as we live outside the city limits.

She thought it was the presidential election.

Oh, if only that were so.

When did all the campaigning start? Eight months ago? A year ago? How many debates have there been? How many fundraising events? How many millions of dollars have been socked away? Considering the gaggle of candidates on both sides, it's mind boggling.

With each presidential election, the campaign season gets longer and more expensive. It's not the most qualified candidate who's ahead, it's the one who's got the most money and the best organization

I'm just not sure if we'll really care about who wins a year from now. We'll just be glad it's over. With the primaries all happening in February, the nomination will be all sewn up for each candidate with nine months before election. I don't even want to think about the avalanche of negative ads (and they will go negative) flooding the airwaves.

There's got to be a better way but I'll be damned if I know what it is.

Talk to you again about this Wednesday, November 5, 2008.

There has to be a better way, but I'll be damned if I know what it is.

In the meantime, mark your calendar Wednesday, November 5, 2008, when the zoo ends, at least for a year or two.


Posted by judy5cents at 7:43 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 6 November 2007
Like Old Friends

For my husband's last birthday, which was in March, I gave him a new bathrobe. It was really nice, a black terry cloth/velour robe and what made it even better was that it was marked down from its original price of $65 to $12.50. But he refused to wear it, because it was too nice. He preferred the ratty old bathrobe he'd been wearing for the last 13 years.

The thing is, that old ratty bathrobe once looked just as nice as the new one. I know, because I gave it to him for his birthday in March of 1994. It was navy blue terry/cloth velour and it also had been marked down from its original price  of $60 plus to around $10 or so.

So a few weeks back, I swiped the old ratty bathrobe and took it to the Good Will, along with my daughter's outgrown shoes, blue jeans and the food dehydrator we never used. Now he has no choice but to wear the new one.

He's getting used to it.

I've assured him that in a year's time, the new one will look and feel the same as the old one. It just needs to be broken in.

Is there anything like the comfort and familiarity of an old bathrobe? The one you wear on Saturday mornings when there's no place to go and you can just kick back. When it's only family and they don't care what you look like.

People are like that. Comfortable. Familiar. Warm when it's cold outside. Really nice when they're brand new, but so much better when they're broken in.


Posted by judy5cents at 6:59 AM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 31 October 2007
Are You Boring Us To Death?

More observations on the Cape Fear Crime Festival. In my last post I talked about writers who were doing it right--contacting booksellers, targeting their readers, etc. Now I'm going to tackle the mistakes I saw and heard at CFCF. 

First off, let me say I have committed these same errors myself numerous times. So as I point the finger, keep in mind it's pointing at me as well.

Here goes:

Before you get on a panel, have an idea of how you want to answer variations of the question "What's your book about?" Don't ramble. Don't try to summarize the plot. Don't dissect the relationships between characters. A good idea is to come up with what is known as the "Elevator Pitch," a one to two sentence description of your book that's witty and succinct. Your aim is to persuade your listeners shell out money for your book without wasting their time.  It comes from pitching your book or screenplay to executives in the elevator. You've only got 30 seconds to dazzle them.

Don't complain. Okay, so you think that the reason the bestselling author sitting next to you got there because she knows somebody who knows somebody and if you had the same contacts you'd be a best seller too. Keep it to yourself  It's an absolute certainty that she is there because she works really hard and she's very talented. Those kind of comments will not endear you to any of the people who know somebody who knows somebody.

Avoid the BSP, otherwise known as Blatant Self Promotion. Yes, we're all there to sell our books, but you can't beat people over the head with it. No one's interested in the awards you've been nominated for or the number of sales you've made or your Amazon ranking on a particular day.

And when the panel moderator is trying in a subtle way to let you know your time is up, shut up and give someone else a turn.

Conferences are a great place to meet other writers and publishers who could be of great help to you. If you want to be a professional, act professional. And remember, luck may have a lot to do with it, but you can't hit the big time without a good book and a lot of work.


Posted by judy5cents at 8:31 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older